Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Merry Christmas...

Christmas is always a bitter sweet day for me.

One the one hand I have a beautiful tradition with my sister on Christmas Eve where we get together with our families and eat till we're stuffed and exchange presents and watch the kids go crazy.

This year was at my house and it was just a mad-house; but a very fun mad-house.

I always love it.

Christmas day is also great and we usually spend it with family or very good friends.

But, for me, it's also a very sad day and inevitably I'll end up crying and sad.

My most favourite person in the whole world, my grandmother on my mum's side, my Omi passed away on Christmas Day.  Next year will mark the 20th anniversary of her passing.

Without fail each year, I light a candle for her, put on a Bing Crosby Christmas Songs CD and even if I try and stop myself the tears just fall.

I love her so much, and I miss her terribly.


Early in the morning the kids have their presents and it's always fun to watch them opening the presents.  And we always make sure that we give them a lesson on the real meaning of Christmas.  Far too much emphasis is placed on gifts and the like and not enough on the real reasons behind Christmas.  They're old enough now to go to Church and understand it, so next year we'll be doing that.

Merry Christmas!

Till next time...


Thursday, November 15, 2012

Oh The Hypocrisy...


I just love it!

I was in Darling Harbour not long ago; I thought I'd take my kids for a nice day out.

I'm wondering around and stumble upon a play ground area with a flying fox, slippery dips and climbing structures.

The climbing structure was one of those new pyramid type things made of bouncy rope; and this one was huge.  Probably about 8 metres high....

Here's a few pictures I took, and I'm going to give you a moment to try and guess what it is I'm about to say next....





- cue thinking music-




Yes....You guessed it.

If that was a building site, I'd be in jail, or at the very least in the Industrial Relations Court spending countless thousands of my hard-earned defending a case against myself in a kangaroo court where they have a reverse onus of proof and the  presumption of innocence just doesn't exist.

There is no way in hell I am allowed to have my fully grown construction worker men to climb up and bounce around 8 metres up in the air on a thin little bouncy strand with no harness and no fall protection.

Yet some bright spark lets little kids do it.

Go figure!!


Till next time...



Saturday, September 22, 2012

Reaping the Fruits of Labour...


As you know I've been working with Simon since about September last year and we've been doing all sorts of things with my sales processes, my marketing and my presentations, just to name a few.  

It was tedious work and really quite disheartening alot of the time.

Sadly, I had to let Simon go about 8 weeks ago because I just wasn't getting any results (I am an instant results type of girl!) and we were fast running out of work (and cash!) so I just couldn't afford him any longer - despite the fact that his services weren't all that expensive to start with.

Anyway, I did it.  Well, we did it.

Thanks to all the work that I did do with Simon, all the rejections, all the schmoozing, my new refined sales process, my new refined tendering system, my new refined presentation system, I won a job.

An architect who actually refused every one of my requests to meet with him referred me to this client and the client called me.  So, all my persistence did actually pay off despite the repeated rejections.

And, it's an awesome job that's right up my alley!  It's a juicy commercial job in the suburbs.  It's in the price range we want, it's the size we want, it's the type of architect we want, but most importantly it's the type of client we want.  

BUT, best of all...it has excellent margins in it AND admin fees too!

Now, this is a first for us....We've always been too scared to add the cost of admin into our tenders because we were always worried that that would push our prices far over everyone else's that the clients get tenders from.  Afterall, we know we're already at the higher end of mid to the lower end of high on the price scale as it is.  So, as a result we've left admin out and then when we've won the job been treated as quasi-project managers....unpaid.  Any cost of admin has come out of our margins on the job.

Now, I've got an awesome lawyer and an awesome insurance broker and over the last 4 months they've both been singing off the same song sheet; "Ms TTW, you must charge admin.  Your margins are your profit and profit is profit.  Admin is a cost of the job and as such must be included in your tender price as a cost, not taken out of your profits."

I knew they were right, but I have been too scared till now....

But, I read a book and there was a message in it that hit me like a tonne of bricks.  The message was "you are not selling a product at a price, you are selling the way you do business."

That made a lot of sense to me.  So, I created a formula to include admin in our tender price.

And I used it in this juicy little commercial  job.

I still had to negotiate, but the point is I included it, the clients accepted it and I won the job.  I didn't win the job on price, I won it on all that stuff that goes along with the job; the way we communicate, the way we plan, the way we invoice, the way we're detailed and the way we related to the client.

It was also a live test drive of my new qualifying systems I've implemented so we have a higher chance of winning the right jobs offered by the right clients.  

So, this was a major win for us on many levels, and hopefully the start of what is a major turnaround for our business.  If I can do 2 or 3 of these types of jobs per year I'll be a very happy woman.


Till next time...

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Pricing Goods and Services...

On my travels today I've stumbled across this timely article; my husband and I have been having discussions about our pricing strategies lately in an effort to find the "right" way...

Why the price is rarely right for start-ups
By Nina Hendy
Monday, 23 July 2012
 Deciding what to charge can be a huge decision for a new business. Over-charge and you risk alienating potential customers. Under-charge and you may not be able to meet demand.
On top of this dilemma is the knowledge that your choice will be scrutinised – and not necessarily just by customers.
When calculating what to charge, consider a recent warning from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, which will investigate businesses misleadingly claiming that price hikes are the result of the carbon price.

The warning was prompted by the discovery that a solar panel business was blaming jacked-up prices on the impact of the carbon price.
Dr Michael Schaper, acting chairman at the ACCC, says price rise claims must be truthful and have a reasonable basis.
“Businesses must be careful in relying on unverified statements by third parties, including those made in newspaper articles and advertisements about the impact of the carbon price, as a basis for their claims,” Schaper says.

The common approach

But when it comes to price-setting, the majority of Australian businesses use extremely crude strategies.
In fact, 75% of companies use ‘cost plus mark-up pricing’, a method which often results in under-charging and missing margins, or overcharging and missing the sale, according to the experts.
Ron Wood, director of Pricing Insight, a firm which specialises in price optimisation strategies, says that less than 20% of Australian companies have a dedicated pricing management function to drive margin improvement across their business.
“And yet if companies implement a more strategic approach to pricing, it would generate on average between 15% and 100% improvements on profit,” Wood says.
PricingProphets founder and managing director Jon Manning agrees that most companies set their price by calculating their costs, add on a desired profit margin and cross their fingers and hope for the best.
Some also check the price of a competitor’s product (which may not, in fact, be identical to their own product) and charge what the competitor charges.
Or they may just charge what they think the customer will bear, he says.
“Both of these approaches are, in effect, outsourcing pricing to their competitors or customers, leave money on the table and ignore demand and value,” Manning says.
And more often than not, the pricing strategies deployed by start-ups aren’t going to work, according to Julia Bickerstaff, founder of Sydney’s The Business Bakery, which works with SMEs on price-setting strategies.
“Start-ups often start selling their goods or services cheaply, with a plan to increase the price incrementally, but this is a bad approach,” she says.
“You’re far better off setting a fair price up front so you’re not turning people off who have heard about you from friends and wonder why they’re being asked to pay so much more than their friends had to.”
Never set out to be the cheapest in the market, because then you’ve always got to be the cheapest, which can be impossible given the costs involved in running a small business, Bickerstaff advises.

The best approach

A pricing methodology known as ‘value pricing’ is the best approach to price setting, according to Wood.
To implement value-based pricing, consider what the real economic benefits are of your offering to the target market.
This can involve analysing how the product or service will be used by both the immediate buyer and final end user, he says.
In many cases, business people charged with setting prices limit their profit opportunities by being anchored to the cost of production, which serve to drive prices much lower than would otherwise be the case.
Businesses should also create their own pricing tools that enable quick and accurate calculation of quotes, discounts and rebates, Wood says.
“Many businesses take too long to get back to customers, by which stage the customer has already purchased from a competitor, possibly at a much higher price than might have otherwise been the case,” he says.
“Buyers who have an urgent need for a price are often the most price-insensitive as they need it now”.
Dr Greg Chapman, author of a book on pricing called Price: How you can charge more without losing sales, says he has seen countless examples of businesses with unprofitable operations caused by poor calculations made during the price-setting process.
“So many businesses argue that they can’t put up their prices because they will lose money, but in many cases, they’re losing money now,” he says.
“Once a business overcomes the psychological barriers, it can earn significantly more.”
A solid marketing strategy must be in place when prices are being increased, he says.
“You need to be able to clearly communicate your point of difference in your marketing. You need to communicate whether your product saves customers time, lasts longer or is better quality so the market can see why you’re charging the prices that you are.”
“And you need to communicate those messages to the part of the market to which these differences matter.”

Retaining your value

Start-ups should also bear in mind the importance that price has on the value of their brand.
Manning suggests businesses align price and value, charging a high price for high value, medium price for medium value and a low price for low value.
Misaligning price and value equates to overcharging, with a high price and medium value often seen as a rip-off, while something of high price and low value viewed as a false economy, he says.
Companies should also remember that prices that end in zeros are typically associated with quality, while prices ending in nines are often associated with cheapness, Manning says.
Also, pick your distribution channels carefully. “You don’t look for Louis Vuitton suitcases in the Reject Shop,” Manning says.
“And be sure to provide excellent customer service. Service is an experience that is hard to replicate and commoditise.”
“Cheap products are often associated with little or no service, premium products with exceptional customer service,” he says.

When costs rise

If you’re pricing on the basis of value, rising costs shouldn’t concern you that much because innovation and value-adding are the key driver of price increases, says Manning.
However, because most companies use the cost-plus pricing approach that the experts frown upon, rising costs is an issue, he says.
Manning praised the approach taken by both an airline and a chemical manufacturer when passing on costs.
Both businesses developed fuel or raw material price indices, published them on their website and told their customers that when this indicator breached a certain threshold, they would no longer be able to absorb the cost increases and would be forced to pass them on to customers.
“This is a really great, transparent approach that I would recommend,” Manning says.
  • The ACCC has issued an updated carbon price claims guide for business, which provides guidance to assist business in understanding their rights and obligations when making claims about the impact of the carbon price. For more information, visit the ACCC website.

Seven top tips on setting your price

  • Work out the benefits of the product/service to the target audience, your incurred costs and what your target audience is willing to pay.
  • Pick distribution channels with caution.
  • Consider not advertising your prices so you can sell the product/service rather than the price.
  • Provide exceptional service
  • Be up-front with your customers about any price rises and the reasons they are being passed on.
  • Create your own pricing tool to enable quick and accurate calculation of quotes, discounts and rebates.
  • Consider hiring a pricing expert to help set your price.



Source: http://www.startupsmart.com.au/sales/why-the-price-is-rarely-right-for-start-ups/201207236997.html

Till next time...

Monday, May 28, 2012

Ground hog day...



Construction firm Hastie Group and 44 of its subsidiaries have been placed in voluntary administration, leaving thousands of jobs at risk after the business discovered "accounting irregularities" worth as much as $20 million.

But this is only the latest development in a string of bad announcements for the company, which has seen its shares tumble by 93% during the past year – it has been attempting to recapitalise itself for months.
Hastie last traded at just 16 cents, down from as high as $2.45 at this time last year. Industry unions are already riled by the announcement, which has left thousands of employees without work. The business has 7,000 employees overall, with 4,000 in Australia.

Ian Carson, David McEvoy and Craig Crosbie of PPB Advisory were appointed as administrators after the company announced the accounting irregularities last week.

In a statement, Carson said the move is a disappointment, but there was no other option "given the extreme financial situation".
"We are obliged to confirm Hastie Group's ability to fund trading before we can resume business. We need time to assess the details of the situation and to determine the viability of the ongoing businesses.
"In the meantime, we remain acutely aware of Hastie Group's role on major construction projects and are assessing those urgently. We will provide an update to employees and other affected parties as soon as possible."
All New Zealand businesses will continue to operate as normal, although receivers and managers have been appointed to one company there.
This comes after the company announced it had found "irregularities" in its finances – as high as $20 million.
"These irregularities date from the financial year 2009 and appear to have resulted from the deliberate actions of a current employee (on suspension)," the company said last week.
Accounting irregularities totalling $3 million were discovered during the audit process for the first half of the year and were taken as a net loss. But "fresh information" prompted a new investigation.
PPB was contacted this morning, but no reply was available prior to publication.
The collapse comes during what has been one of the worst years in recent history for the construction market, with record numbers of insolvencies, while fraud has also been on the rise fuelled by global economic turmoil.
This is the latest development in a line of bad news for the company.
Earlier this month, Hastie's shares were suspended due to a "review event" prompted by the company's banking syndicate. The review event was set aside, but Hastie was still in negotiations over financing – it submitted two proposals on May 18 and gave no further update.
In its latest financial report, for the half-year ending December 31 2011, the company recorded a net loss before tax of $159 million up from a loss of $95 million during the previous corresponding period.
The result led to the company breaking some of its banking covenants, which caused debt repayments to be accelerated.
And yet Hastie had even more problems last month surrounding a dispute in the Middle East with Dutco Balfour Beatty over a building project. DBB wanted to terminate the company's contract and called for payment of performance bank guarantees worth $6.2 million.
A second update on May 3 said DBB had been paid $7.4 million under the bank guarantees.
As a result of all of this, Hastie said anticipated EBIT for the second half of the year would be "reduced to approximately $0".
Non-executive directors Lindsay Phillips and Harry Boon resigned from their positions last week.

Source: http://www.smartcompany.com.au/construction-and-engineering/049909-how-a-20-million-fraud-took-down-construction-firm-hastie-group.html



And in other news:

St Hilliers Construction founder Tim Casey says the firm is owed more than $6 million by the NSW government and has slammed its decision to take over 13 NSW social housing projects.
Speaking at a creditors' meeting in Sydney on Friday, Casey said he had written to the State Treasurer, Premier and Finance Minister over the $8.1 million in work St Hilliers has undertaken on the projects.
Casey claims the construction business has only been paid $1.4 million.
Of the $6.7 million still owed, $3.5 million is owed to sub-contractors of St Hilliers Construction.
Casey says St Hilliers plans to sell the company’s Cumberland Street headquarters in Sydney, worth up to $22 million, to pump money into the ailing construction business.
“It’s a high-handed decision of the state government to [terminate these state housing contracts],” Casey said at the creditors' meeting.
One contractor on the NSW housing projects, Ivan Stefanac, a gyprocker who is owed $41,000, told The Australian he does not expect to receive any money now that the government has taken over the projects.
At the meeting Casey said all but two of the projects would be reopened and said he was confident the construction business would find a way to start trading again.
There are about 1,000 creditors of St Hilliers Construction.
At the meeting, attended by about 100 creditors, administrators Trent Hancock and Michael Hird of Moore Stephens Sydney Corporate Recovery Group did not say how much was owed to creditors.
The St Hilliers website is functioning normally again after previously only linking through to a press release about the voluntary administration decision.
Separately, the Reed Group, which is facing the threat of supplier seeking to wind up the business, has had its claim that it is owed up to $70 million by the NSW state government rejected following a parliamentary hearing.
An independent expert panel chaired by Andrew Rogers QC found that the monies Reed claims it is owed by the state government were not “anywhere near” the true figure.
Reed claims the money is owed for work done on building roads and building schools as part of the federal government’s $16.2 billion Building the Education Revolution scheme.

Source:http://www.propertyobserver.com.au/news/st-hilliers-founder-says-government-owes-it-millions-but-reed-group-government-claim-rejected/2012052854859


Till next time...

Friday, May 25, 2012

Another sign of the times?...

Hmmm....yet another one on the brink...
A proceeding has been filed in the NSW Supreme Court to wind up Reed Constructions Australia after the construction company missed a government-imposed deadline earlier this week.


The NSW Government gave Reed until May 21 to prove it could restart work on key major works projects after the construction company suffered a severe cashflow crisis and failed to pay subcontractors on four road projects, causing the workers to down tools.


Reed was described by the state opposition as on the verge of collapse with 1,500 jobs at risk.


That deadline has passed and now BCI Nominees has commenced proceedings, which will be heard on June 20, to wind up Reed.


Church and Grace is representing BCI Nominees but the law firm did not respond to SmartCompany’s request for comment prior to publication.


Reed has claimed it is owed up to $97 million from work it has completed on Building the Education Revolution and other government projects.


However, the NSW Government said it is investigating whether up to $90 million of Building the Education Revolution money was diverted to expand a division of Reed.


An expert panel, led by Andrew Rogers QC, was established by the government when it learnt of Reed’s financial difficulties in February.


Reed agreed to a government demand that subcontractors be paid first from any decision on Reed’s claims.


Reed Constructions told SmartCompany it was unable to comment on the wind up notice.


The company issued a statement from managing director Geoff Reed, in which he said the company and the government were still finalising the expert panel’s determination.


“Reed Constructions Australia Pty Ltd is pleased that the expert panel has provided its interim determination for liability relating to variation claims for works carried out by Reed for Roads and Maritime Services and the Building the Education Revolution Program,” Reed said.


“As Reed and the NSW Government are in the process of finalising the determination, we are unable to make any further comment at this time.”


NSW Minister for Finance and Services Greg Pearce released a statement earlier in the week that said the government’s priority was to protect jobs and ensure the projects were completed while ensuring taxpayers got value for money.


“The NSW Liberals and Nationals are getting on with the job of fixing this mess so that the projects can be completed as soon as practicable,” Pearce said in the statement.


SmartCompany contacted Pearce, but he failed to respond prior to publication.


Source: http://www.smartcompany.com.au/construction-and-engineering/049884-application-filed-to-wind-up-troubled-reed-construction-group-as-investigation-continues-into-missing-90-million.html



Till next time...

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Margins; the Be All and End All?...

I was listening to my favourite talk back radio station a couple of days ago and the morning presenter was talking about the 2 major supermarkets and their duopoly.

He was talking about the fact that 3 or 4 (can't recall the number) major tomato farmers have recently gone bust and he was also talking about how the majors work when it comes to sales and specials.

Essentially, what he was saying was that when the majors decide to run a sale or special it is the farmer, producer, manufacturer that really runs the sale (unbeknownst to us, the consumer).

So, if an apple, for example, costs the supermarket 80c to buy from the farmer, they'll sell it for say $1.40, so a mark-up of 60c.  But, if the supermarket decides to run a special and discount the apple by 40c, thus selling it for $1.00 that doesn't mean that the supermarket is being generous; it means that the supermarket is telling the farmer to bend over so they can screw him some more!

It is the poor old farmer that suffers because he will only get paid 40c for that same apple; that same apple that takes just as long to grow, that same apple that takes just as much labour to pick, sort, box and distrubute, yet it is the supermarket that still has his 60c profit!

How on earth does this work? 

And more importantly, how has this been allowed to happen, and allowed to continue?

It is such a ridiculous proposition that the margins of the supermarkets are a protected species yet the margins of the farmer are not?

This isn't just isolated to the farming industry.

Take the banks as another example.

The RBA recently lowered the cash rate by 50 basis points yet the banks only passed on a portion of it.  Why?  Because they need to maintain their margin!

WTF???  What gives them the right to protect their margins, but the farmer can not, or the manufacturer competing with some cheap import can not, or the builder can not.

What makes them so special?

Something has to change, because this is just plain wrong.  Companies run by hardworking individuals are going broke because big business are screwing them for the sake of their own margin...for the shareholders, for maximum growth!

Well, what about the shareholders of the companies going broke?

It's just not OK.


Till next time...



Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Need I Say Any More?...

Ha!

Following on from my last post, here's some more doom and gloom...albeit a little old, but nothing's changed since this was written!

http://www.smartcompany.com.au/construction-and-engineering/048778-suburban-tradies-collapse-as-construction-and-building-industries-suffer-through-2012.html


Till next time...

Murphy's Law and other bits...

I've had a funny start to the week this week.


On Friday I had my regular fortnightly session with Simon and he was having a go at me because I haven't done any of the internet  marketing stuff that he set for me to do.


I've been saying to him for quite a while that I think all this internet stuff is bullshit and all this Adwords stuff is just ridiculous (not to mention so freaking complicated I'm flabbergasted that anyone can make any sense of how it all works!).


So, after my little rant and refusal to do the things he's asked of me, Murphy's Law just had to stick it to me.  I received 2 random enquiries from the internet.


Of course, it just had to happen to me.


But, I still stand by my opinion for the moment.  Now instead of completely against it all, I've opened myself to the possibility that it may be beneficial in some small way.


The jury is still out.




On another front, I'm really, really starting to become worried about what the future holds for me.


We've recently had Kell & Rigby go down, Reed Constructions is goodness-knows where, the Nahas site near to me has been abandoned for several months with rumours they're also on the brink of failure and there are a couple of other companies that have either failed or are on the brink of failure (whose names all escape me right this moment) and this morning another heavy weight of the construction industry, St Hilliers, has gone into Voluntary Administration.


http://www.smartcompany.com.au/construction-and-engineering/049712-construction-pain-continues-as-st-hilliers-placed-in-voluntary-administration-after-funding-failure.html


So, I ask yet again, if these boys can't make it with all their collective wisdom, experience, know-how and contacts, what hope does small-fry like me have?


You know, I haven't analysed the data but it really wouldn't surprise me at all if we were in a recession.  But the media and the government are just too darn scared to mention the "R" word.  Grow some balls people and stop pretending everything is OK...because it's not.  This country is become more and more f'd up by the day and it is very, very upsetting!




Till next time...
  




Thursday, May 10, 2012

Declaration of Lack of Independence...

Thank you to a friend of mine for alerting me to this wonderful article!



Time and chance happeneth to them all.
(Ecclesiastes 9:11 – King James Version)

Declaration of Lack of Independence

by James Allan
May 10, 2012


Let me paraphrase the old gag of former New Zealand Prime Minister Robert Muldoon and tell you that Craig Thomson’s move out of the Labor Party to sit with the independents on the cross-benches has done one thing for sure. It has raised the average IQ of both the Labor Party and the independents.

And what astonishing examples of independents they are. No matter how superb their bargaining power, they extract virtually nothing from Ms. Gillard’s government save for a few trifling baubles here and there. (I assume that by now no one counts the NBN as a life-altering good thing.)
They just vote with the government through thick and thin, regardless of the swirl of surrounding events.

Normally that’s not most accurately described by the adjective ‘independent’. Somewhat more apt might be descriptions such as ‘retainers’ or ‘sycophants’ or ‘lap dogs’ or, well, ‘dependents’.
You see at least when it comes to Messrs Oakeshott and Windsor they are very much dependent on this government plodding on in order to stay in Parliament. Neither has the remotest chance of being re-elected. It may well be that one or both of them won’t even have the courage to run again and take their medicine from the constituents whom they misled.

If you understand politics in terms of principles, then it’s hard to see what principle motivates these two men to keep this Gillard government in power. I suppose you could say that both were always a bit on the rural socialist side of things that fits a bit with some Labor outlooks. But if there’s any principle at work at all it seems to me to be an old-fashioned sort of hatred aimed at the National Party and Mr. Abbott, together with a puffed up self-regard that isn’t all that pleasant to observe.
Of course if you throw out that sort of template and see politics in terms of self-interest, or even of rent-seeking behaviour, then these two men just come across as incompetent. Let’s be honest. They have got next to nothing extra for their constituents. And they’ve destroyed completely their own political careers.

They will be remembered as the men who put into office, and kept there, the worst government in Australia’s history. Mr. Whitlam should be thanking them every chance he gets.

And that sort of accomplishment surely deserves special recognition. How about commemorating it in a Declaration of Lack of Independence? With apologies to Mr. Jefferson, here’s my suggestion.

When in the course of human events (including inadvertently finding yourself holding the balance of power between the political party you once belonged to and any other party at all) it becomes necessary for a few loose cannons to dissolve the bonds that separate them from not just from their former party but from the wishes of the preponderance of their constituents, a decent respect to the opinions of the ABC requires that they should support anyone but the Coalition, and continue to do so regardless of what that propped up Government does and however many breaches of trust with the voters it may commit.
Indeed we hold these truths to be self-evident. That all independents will vote with the Labor Government come what may. That all confidence votes are created equal and will not be allowed to bring down Labor. That we dependents (oops, independents) have been endowed by our creator Ms. Gillard with certain inalienable entitlements, that among those are Serving a full three years to pursue as much happiness as we can before it all goes down in flames. And that to secure these entitlements, this Government has been instituted by us, deriving its just powers from the consent not of the governed, but of us, Tony and Rob.
And lastly, whenever this Government becomes destructive of the interests and consent of the governed, tough toenails.
Now there’s a Declaration our two independent MPs might find they could sign up to. Meantime anyone who thinks either man, under any circumstances, will bring down this government seems delusional to me.




Source: http://www.quadrant.org.au/blogs/allan/2012/05/declaration-of-lack-of-independence


Till next time...

Customer service really does not exist anymore...

This morning I went to my local supermarket and fruit market to top up on some supplies.

I went to the fruit market first and paid for my purchase using my debit card. 

I then went to the supermarket next door and went to pay for my purchase using the exact same card that I used not 2 minutes earlier and it wouldn't work.

The woman behind the counter tried my card several times all the while saying that there must be a problem with my card because they're new machines in the store.

Well, not to make a big deal out of things, I told her I'd run to the ATM just a few doors down and be back, which I did.

So, when I went back to pay for my purchase with cash I told her what happened to me just 2 weeks ago.

I said "you know, it can't be my card that's the problem.  It must be your new systems that are the probelm.  I shopped at your supermarket in a different location 2 weeks ago.  I purchased $400 worth of groceries and my card wouldn't work in your other store either". 

And the lady looked at me and shrugged her shoulders.

She shrugged her shoulders!

Oh my goodness.

I said to her "Is that all you can do, just shrug your shoulders.  Don't stand there and act like what I've just said doesn't matter, because it does matter.  There's clearly a problem with your new systems and I'm telling you about it".

Surprised at my comment she asked "What do you want me to do, tell my manager"?

To which I said "well, yes!  Not right now, but when you have a quiet moment you should be saying to your manager 'I had a customer today and she told me this, this and this', that's what you should do".

And I handed her my money and walked out.

I just couldn't believe the attitude...she just didn't care.

How does business survive when they have front line staff with such high degree of non-care?

All I can do is shake my head in sadness for the bosses of these businesses.  I feel sorry for them.


Till next time...

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Whinge, Whinge...

Some people who may stumble upon this blog may read it and think that all I do is whinge. 

I sometimes think that all I do is whinge...but for crying out loud...I wouldn't whinge if people didn't give me things to whinge about, now, would I?

Sometimes I really wonder whether I'm properly equipped to handle my job. 

I've got some clients at the moment and they are a challenge to say the least.  The fact that it took one year from initially meeting them to eventually entering in to a contract should have been a clue (but we all have 20-20 vision with the benefit of hindsight, don't we!).  But I actually enjoyed that whole process; that cat and mouse, too-ing and fro-ing dance that we did.  It's just everything after that that I can't stand.

Yet another reason it would be best if I got back into property development.

Either that, or expanded the business so much (soon!) that I could employ a CRM person to handle the clients once I've gotten them past Contract.

Now that I think about it, I'm not equipped to do my job.  Perhaps equipped is the wrong word. 

To put it simply, I don't want to do one of the roles I'm doing now.

I don't want to look after clients.  I'm happy to bring them through the sales process and to the point of about to start contruction (ie, contracts signed, deposit paid), but after that, I'd love to hand them over to a "pom-pom" girl...someone who can act as their cheerleader and advocate and handle their every little query, concern, request, etc.

That person is just not me. 

I'm quite OK with dealing with issues that need to be escalated, but not the little bits and pieces of daily stuff that needs to be dealt with during a build.

Let me just continue developing my relationships with architects, project managers and other work sources and get the work in, and I'll be happy.

Till then, I'll really dislike a number of aspects of my job.


Till next time...

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Crunch Time Approaching...

That's right.

Things are going to get scary pretty soon.

I haven't done a single tender since the last one I posted about back in March! 

Even people who aren't in business know that it's a numbers game and the more you tender the more likelihood of securing work.

So, what's the problem?

Well, I've been working on my marketing stuff since I started working with Simon (Nov last year??).  I've got all that down pat, I think. 

I'm getting out there and meeting architects (who are my primary source of work) and getting myself and my company known as best I can.

I'm calling as many private individuals who require building services as I can.

But nothing's moving, nothing's shaking.  Simply nothing is happening.

The architects are pretty much all saying the same thing; it's quiet.  Will include you on the next tender...

But when is that next tender going to come around?

So, what do I do?

Do I start looking at renovations, additions and extensions? 

Sometimes I think that maybe I should.  But then I remember the countless tenders I did for these types of jobs and the number of jobs I won (not!!).  I'm simply not competitive in that sub $600k market. 

Do I adjust my methodologies so that I become competitive in that market? 

Well, I just don't know.  That essentially means working for very little and taking on monumental risk for the privelege of doing so; not to mention the requirement to take on multiple projects at any given time because your model becomes about volume not margin.  I understand why so many builders just don't take on renovations, additions or extensions; it's hardly worth it.  I look at the last renovation job we completed and the reward was certainly not commensurate with the effort and resources it took to get the job completed within the time frames required.  And it was really stressful too; very different to building a new home from the ground up.

Do I look at establishing multiple arms to the business, thus generating multiple revenue streams?

There's small works, there's project/volume homes and there's insurance work.

They'll all take time and  money to establish.  And even though they all work on a lower margin higher volume model, you're spreading your risk across multiples of smaller jobs instead of one or two larger jobs at any one time, so on the surface it would appear to be a much better option than branching into reno's, additions and extensions.

The small works has the potential to whittle away my Home Warranty Insurance limits so that if I do get a nice, big, juicy home to build I may end up not having sufficient Insurance to take the job on anyway (the Home Warranty Insurance set up in this state is a disaster, and the subject of many a future rant from moi!).

The project/volume home idea is very attractive to me, and the more I day dream about it, the more it's growing on me.  But, the time it would take to establish is lengthy; I need to come up with house designs (and various options for each), inclusions lists, get a stable of project home trades, then start a whole new marketing push to a different market.  It's do-able, but it will take significant human resources (ie - my time...which we all know is limited as it is).  The costs, I expect, would be minimal because I wouldn't go the whole hog and build a display home.

So, what about insurance work? 

Well, I have done a little bit of investigation...but it has been limited.  Why?  Because when I call the insurance companies to speak to the most appropriate person who awards builders with these contracts, no one knows who to connect me to!!  

Is that a joke, or what??

So, I'm at a bit of a standstill when it comes to that.  I don't quite know how to move forward with it.

I've had a look at some of the builders who are exclusively insurance builders and it would appear that their technological set-ups are pretty sophisticated.  In time I would need to do something similar if I were to go that path....that's if I even get there, that is!

So, what do I do?

Well, I just don't have an answer.  At all.  And that's what worries me most.

I recall reading a book about Richard Branson, and there was a story about him being on his last legs financially.  What he did was go and borrow some money and buy himself an income stream.  That's right - he went and bought himself another business.  Each time he was in strife he went and got himself into debt and new business.

Should we take that approach?  Should we go and buy another business that's generating cashflow that can keep us liquid during this slowdown? 

So, what's the answer?  What do I do?

I just don't know...and the fact that I don't know is freaking me out....alot.  I'm half tempted to embark on all 4 approaches so I don't miss something, but that's just dumb thinking brought about by panic on my part.

I was talking to a friend of mine last week and told him of my recent rough times and I was telling him that ultimately I'd like to get back into property development and that this contracting business is simply a means to achieving that.  Having experienced contracting I'll never give it away; we'll always continue to do contracting even when we're back doing our own developments.  But, the ultimate goal was to get back to doing my own thing, just not on a scale as big as what I was doing it before my downturn.  I was saying to him that a total cost of complete of around $5m is about all I'll do.  That's very manageable and I can do it largely on my own with very little staff.  I just need the money to get going again, which is what the contracting is supposed to provide.

He asked me the question "have you considered equity funding/partnering as opposed to debt funding"....well,  of course!  But where on earth do I find these people?

He claims there's stacks of private money around with no where to go....but I just don't know where to look for this private money.  Where is it?

I've previously gone down the road of seeking investors, but investors are a whole different kettle of fish with a totally different mentality to equity partners.

So, if I had a genie in a bottle in front of me granting me 3 wishes, one of those wishes would be to have the funds to do my own developments again so I don't have to burden myself with the anguish of constantly trying to source work in an environment that simply isn't conducive to people spending their money, thus providing me with the work.

I wish this selfish bloody labor federal government of ours would do the honourable thing and call an election so the Libs can take control and get this country running properly again! 

That would be my second wish.

And my third wish would be to win the OzLotto $70m jackpot being drawn tonight!  LOL


Till next time...




Thursday, March 22, 2012

And another one bites the dust...

Yep, that's right...missed out on another tender this week.

I was $40,000 more expensive than my underbidder.

The clients loved me, the architect loved me too...so one has to wonder why they didn't ring me and even try to haggle...

Sometimes I really HATE this industry.  Another 4 weeks wasted.

I have 2 more tenders sitting on my desk waiting for my attention...so there's another 8 weeks worth of unpaid work I need to do for a slight hope of getting some more work! 

Don't you just love it??

Thursday, February 23, 2012

The Cost is the cost...

I had a bit of a disheartening day today. 

About 2 weeks ago I received a referral as a result of some concentrated marketing activities I've been undertaking over the last little while.  Once I received the referral I spoke with the prospective client, gave him a brief rundown on who we are, what we do etc etc...and he sounded really interested, and likewise, I was interested in his job.

His plans were awesome!  Fantastic new home in a beautiful area surrounded by million dollar homes right on the bay.  Double storey, pool, double garage, 4 bedrooms, study...nice....something they can really grow into.

So, I sent him our portfolio to review and we ended up making our appointment to meet today.

Now, before I agree to tender any job I always insist on meeting the prospective clients so they can get a feel for me and I can get a feel for them; afterall, they're about to potentially enter into a 12-plus month relationship with me so they need to be comfortable and I need to like them.

I spent 2 hours with them discussing every little thing about their new home from what sort of tiles they want to their appliances to their landscaping to the type of toilet the architect has designed into their plans, and of course, I'm diligently taking it all down to incorporate into my tender.

So, toward the end of the meeting I decide to give it a go....ask the unaskable (and rarely truthfully answered) question..."what's your budget"?

And...silence.

I continue, "I know you're thinking right now that you don't want to tell me your budget because you think I'll just squeeze my tender into your price so you'll not really get a true quote, but that couldn't be further from the truth.  I'm about to invest 4 weeks of my time to do your tender, and if in the first week or so it looks as though your budget will be blown, I'll call you and discuss it with you, so it is important that I know so I don't waste your time and I don't waste my time".

This must have made sense to them because the husband says "if I can get the whole job done, including the pool (!!), basic landscaping, the driveway and the front fence for between $500 and $600,000 I'll be happy".

WHAT???

My heart sank.

Now here's the part that I can never work out...is he telling the truth or trying it on?

The house is 253sqm, and every single job I've done/am doing over the last 2 years has come in at between $3,000 and $3,500 per square metre...so, we're looking at $759,000 to $885,000 plus GST.

He claims he received a quotation for around $1,500 per square metre to lock up, which prompts me to wonder exactly what sort of corners will be cut and what sort of building the poor client will end up with, and then, what must the client think it's going to cost to fix out the home?

But, honestly, do people really think you can get a decent home built for this sort of money?

So now I have the awful job of telling this person that I won't be tendering his job unless he either re-adjusts his price expectations or comes clean with the truth about his real budget.

It was a cracker of a job, so it's really disappointing for me.

I just wish people would get a better grip of reality.  I think I have to change my MO and only deal with architects from now on rather than the clients directly; at least architects may have a bit more realistic point of view that they can impart to their clients.

Till next time...

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

CRM, ERP, XRM, Blah!...

Oh my goodness, someone shoot me!

I've been trialling various software products for CRM and it was driving me absolutely bonkers. 

Initially I thought I just wanted CRM functionality because working off spreadsheets was driving me insane and honestly just putting me off all those things I had to do for my marketing endeavours. 

Then I discovered something called ERP, which is like Project Management software (I think - this is all so gobbledegook to me), which I found appealing.  Afterall, I'm working on projects that run for an extended period of time, and I'm looking to implement something now that can be used by others as well as myself in the not too distant future.

But then I started thinking, well, if I'm going to have a combined CRM/ERP solution, it's pretty dumb that I don't have the accounting functions integrated into it as well so when I'm working with my clients in the CRM I have a complete picture of their position in relation to my company....and this led me to XRM!

The X is basically anything you want it to be, as far as I can ascertain.

I thought I found something I liked that was the complete deal and it was specific to the construction industry which I rationalised was essential because of the nature of the way our industry works.  I've bookmarked it for future reference as I think it was too big for us, if that makes sense.

Now, on top of all this I discovered things called SaaS, open source, on premises, hosted and managed, hosted and not managed....and I really meant it; someone just shoot me!

Why on earth couldn't I find something that I liked but I could also get on premises?  Now, I'm not a ludite, and I'm ok with advances in technology, but I've got to say this whole Cloud technology doesn't quite sit so well with me yet.  It hasn't been around long enough for me to be comfortable exporting my data to it and leaving it in someone elses hands to manage.  Now, my data is really piddly compared to other companies out there, but still, it's my data and if something happens to it then I have to start again.

Simon (my business coach) thinks I'm crazy and says there's more chance of someone breaking into my home and stealing my laptop (where my data is stored) than there is someone hacking a cloud host and taking my data (and besides, there's not much they can do with my data anyway).

So, I did it.  I purchased my first SaaS (software as a service for those uninitiated!) application yesterday.

I decided to go with a CRM that had a really "loose" style of Projects in it.  I have to say it was the first one I trialled after I read someone elses blog who said she was using it too.  I liked the looseness of the Projects because it really just lets me run things my way instead of how the software developers things things should be run.  I trialled too many to remember but just kept coming back to this first one.  It just felt better than the rest.

Next thing on the list is to see if I can work with Google Apps including GMail for Business as this CRM that I bought yesterday intergrates with Google Apps and it'll save me keeping 2 sets of contacts; one in Outlook and the other in my CRM.

On other fronts, my marketing efforts are going reasonably well and Simon and I are developing a rather good system for all the marketing I need to do.  The only problem is I'm supposed to call the people I'm directly marketing to within 2 weeks of my initial marketing to them, and I hate it.  I really, really hate it.  I'm finding it so hard to get motivated to do it.

It's not so much the clients directly that I have an issue calling; it's the architects that I have the problem with.  Simon laughs, I'm sure, at my logic.  You see, in my mind, if I'm calling an architect enquiring about potential work, it's like I'm grovelling and it's a really uneven start to the relationship.  I don't do uneven very well.  I like even.

I really need to change my mindset somehow so that I can think to myself that I have something they need just as much as they have something I need.  Easier said than done, though...

Anyway, till next time...

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

"Get back on board, dammit"...

So, I was blog surfing this morning and came across this post.  I thought it was apt so have decided to repost here.

Those were the words of Italian Coast Guard Gregorio de Falco to Captain Francesco Schettino while he was abandoning his ship, leaving 4,200 people on board to perish (at least 12 died).
When you “mess up” and difficulty strikes, how do you handle it?
Do you take responsibility, do whatever it takes to make it right, step up and take action (like the Coast Guard)… or do you shirk responsibility, leave the scene of the disaster you created and start looking for someone else to blame (like the Captain)?
The translated exchange between the Captain and Coast Guard is transcribed below. In parenthesis are examples of excuses we might use in our daily lives for not taking responsibility for common failures.
(This isn’t what I envisioned for my life. But I don’t really want to change, please…)
Captain: Please …
Coast Guard: There is no ‘please’ about it. Get back on board.
(But I send out résumés, I leave messages for my prospects, I mail letters…)
Captain: I am here to coordinate the rescue.
Coast Guard (interrupting): What are you coordinating there! Get on board! Coordinate the rescue from on board!
(It’s not my job, the president is supposed to fix it, when Monday comes…)
Captain: (inaudible)… there is another lifeboat…
Coast Guard (interrupting, yelling): You get back on board! That is an order! There is nothing else for you to consider. Now I am giving the orders. Get back on board, dammit! Is that clear? Don’t you hear me?
Captain: I am going aboard.

(The market is down, no one is hiring, our industry is in a recession…)
Captain: Look, chief, I want to go aboard but the other lifeboat here has stopped and is drifting. I have called …
Coast Guard (interrupting): You have been telling me this for an hour! Now, go aboard! Get on board!
The Captain never returned to the ship. According to the harbor master’s office, which notes the final exchange as occurring at 1:46 a.m., Capt. Schettino sought refuge on a rock at 12:30 a.m. Witnesses said he did not return to the ship to run the rescue operations, which went on until 6 a.m.
Tweet from an Italian boy named Salvatore Garzillo: “The next time someone asks me what I want to be when I grow up I am going to say: ‘a man like De Falco.’”
I’ve fallen off my diet. Get back on board!
I haven’t made my prospecting calls. Get back on board!
I haven’t been tracking my new success behaviors. Get back on board!
I stopped using the Living Your Best Year Ever Weekly Rhythm Register. Get back on board!
I’ve missed our weekly date night. Get back on board!
I haven’t been praising my team like I said I would. Get back on board!
I skipped a couple of workouts. Get back on board!
I’m off track on my goals. Get back on board!
Whatever mistakes you have made, how ever you have messed up, no matter what disaster your results might be right now, have Coast Guard Gregorio de Falco’s voice ring in your head, “Get back on board, dammit!”


Where have you abandoned ship in your life or on your goals? Tell us how you are going to “get back on board” in the comments below.

Link: http://darrenhardy.success.com/2012/01/get-back-on-board-dammit/?utm_source=Listrak&utm_medium=Email&utm_term=http%3a%2f%2fdarrenhardy.success.com%2f2012%2f01%2fget-back-on-board-dammit%2f%23more&utm_campaign=Seeds-2012-01-24&utm_content=Unlock+Your+Code+for+Success#more

Till next time...

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Happy New Year...

Yes, and what a happy new year it will be!

I've decided to redirect this blog to encompass more of the journey I have embarked upon in rebuilding my life.

Rebuilding my life revolves, obviously, around business.

So, to give a bit of background that isn't mentioned elsewhere, I'm attempting to re-establish my family and myself via a construction company specialising in architecturally designed, higher value ($1m plus at this stage, but eventually $2m plus) residential new home construction and substantial renovation projects.  My husband is the builder and the braun of the company and I am on the administration side of the company.  So, essentially, I'm responsible for keeping the wheels of momentum in motion (read: getting the work).

In 2010 we secured our first job, and it was only by accident really.  My husband was undertaking some detailed renovation work on a relative's home when one of the subcontractors asked my husband if he could help out his inlaws who'd engaged a project home builder who subsequently did a bit of a phoenix scheme.  The inlaws didn't wish to enter into a new contract with the newly arisen company and the project sat idle for many months.

We submitted our price and eventually started work on the job in early 2010. 

A few months into the job it dawned on us that we should be contracting our services out and creating a business out of it instead of wondering how the hell we can get back into property development.

Afterall, what else could we do?  We were stone broke, just had our empire ripped out from under us and had to start again. 

So we committed to this decision and have been banging away since then.

Since that first job, and because of that first job, we landed another job in the local area.  A renovation project.  We commenced and completed that job during 2011. 

And again, because of that first job, we were contacted by a couple in September 2010 who were designing their new home in the local area.  We worked with that couple throughout the following 12 months and in September 2011 finally signed a contract with them for us to construct their new home.  Work commenced on this job in December 2011, just over a year after our initial contact with them!!  What a time lag, huh?

And somewhere in between all that I picked up another job on the Northern Beaches; the client is an acquaintence of mine.  We're due to hand over that job in the first quarter of this new year.

Anyway, so that's where we're at at the moment. 

I've hired a business coach to keep me on track because I found that I had absolutely no clue about building a business.

When I was doing property development, it wasn't really business; it was more an entreprenuerial enterprise...

So, when it came time that I needed to go out and do marketing, and generate leads and start building my brand (which is the goal), I had no idea what I needed to do, how I needed to do it, what I needed to say or how to say it.

So, I've enlisted some help from Simon (the coach) and we've been working together since September last year.  Essentially what we've been doing is working on all my marketing material, and getting some basic documentation down pat in terms of systems, which is great!  I have a whole heap of systems in my head, but they're no use to anyone in my head.  Everytime I thought about documenting the systems that I've implemented the task just seemed so bloody huge that it was overwhelming and nothing would ever get done.  Simon helps me break it all down into bite sized chunks that I can get through relatively easily.

So, that's it.

Now, in 2012, I commence proper the marketing of my construction business and the establishment and growth of both my brand and my business.

Good luck to us, and happy new year to everyone!